State v. Smith
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 5512
Syllabus
Grand Jury; proceedings; transcript; evidence; particularized need; secrecy; disclosure; speculation; cost; burden; Crim.R. 6(E); R.C. 2939.11. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant's petition for disclosure of grand-jury proceedings because the appellant failed to demonstrate a particularized need. The appellant's speculation that the transcripts might be useful to impeach witnesses in a separate civil case, and that obtaining the information independently would be burdensome, was insufficient to warrant disclosure.
Judges: Forbes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court· 1958-06-02· cited 1,365×
- Johnson v. Abdullah (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2021-09-22· cited 666×
- State v. SellardsOhio Supreme Court· 1985-06-05· cited 417×
- State v. WebbOhio Supreme Court· 1994-09-21· cited 262×
- State v. GreerOhio Supreme Court· 1981-05-13· cited 218×
- State v. DavisOhio Supreme Court· 1988-09-14· cited 151×
- Strauss v. StraussOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-08-04· cited 65×
- Sherrod v. HallerOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-06-30· cited 9×
- State v. WatersOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-23· cited 5×
- Stakich v. RussoOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-12· cited 3×
- State v. LucasOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-02-12· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.