State v. Lucas
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 437
Syllabus
App.R. 26(B), ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, perjured testimony, probable cause, search warrant, indictment, attempted murder, record evidence, and gunshot. Appellant argued that his appellate counsel was ineffective for not arguing that there was no probable cause for the indictment of attempted murder because the indictment and the search warrant were secured by perjured evidence. This court rejected that argument because appellant did not convince the court of perjury and because his arguments rested, at least in part, on matters outside the record.
Judges: Celebrezze
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court· 1983-07-05· cited 7,925×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- State v. IshmailOhio Supreme Court· 1978-06-21· cited 940×
- State v. ReedOhio Supreme Court· 1996-02-14· cited 335×
- State v. AllenOhio Supreme Court· 1996-12-18· cited 116×
- State v. MooreOhio Supreme Court· 2001-12-19· cited 58×
- State v. BurkeOhio Supreme Court· 2002-10-16· cited 50×
- State v. LucasOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-04-23· cited 16×
- Akron Bar Ass'n v. HolderOhio Supreme Court· 2004-06-16· cited 16×
- State v. MyersOhio Supreme Court· 2004-06-30· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.