State v. Smith
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 1548
Syllabus
Plea advisement; Dangler; prejudice; Reagan Tokes Law; R.C. 2929.144; Crim.R. 11; maximum sentence; complete failure. Judgment affirmed. Appellant's plea was knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered, despite the trial court not specifically advising appellant that he was subject to an indefinite sentence under Reagan Tokes. Because we found that the trial court's advisement was not a complete failure to advise of the maximum penalty under Crim.R. 11(C), appellant was required to prove prejudice. Appellant did not establish that he was prejudiced.
Judges: Boyle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court· 1990-12-19· cited 1,637×
- State v. BallardOhio Supreme Court· 1981-06-24· cited 893×
- State v. StewartOhio Supreme Court· 1977-07-13· cited 788×
- State v. EngleOhio Supreme Court· 1996-02-14· cited 784×
- State v. Dangler (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-05-05· cited 408×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court· 1988-12-28· cited 238×
- State v. PoageOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-02-17· cited 17×
- State v. CobbledickOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-10-01· cited 8×
- State v. BerryOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-03-02· cited 8×
- State v. GoodenOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-04-08· cited 6×
- State v. AminOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-10-16· cited 6×
- State v. FosterOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-12-19· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.