Skip to main content

State v. Smith

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 1548

Syllabus

Plea advisement; Dangler; prejudice; Reagan Tokes Law; R.C. 2929.144; Crim.R. 11; maximum sentence; complete failure. Judgment affirmed. Appellant's plea was knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered, despite the trial court not specifically advising appellant that he was subject to an indefinite sentence under Reagan Tokes. Because we found that the trial court's advisement was not a complete failure to advise of the maximum penalty under Crim.R. 11(C), appellant was required to prove prejudice. Appellant did not establish that he was prejudiced.

Judges: Boyle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.