State v. Gooden
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 1192
Syllabus
Crim.R. 11 voluntary, knowing, and intelligent guilty plea Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(a) maximum penalty involved R.C. 2929.14(B)(1)(g) R.C. 2929.14(C)(1)(a) consecutive prison terms for firearm specifications calculation of aggregate prison sentence. The trial court complied with Crim.R. 11. The trial court correctly informed Gooden that the firearm specifications must run consecutively, and it had no obligation to inform Gooden of the maximum aggregate sentence he faced. Gooden also failed to demonstrate that the trial court's alleged mistakes prejudiced him.
Judges: Boyle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. PoageOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-02-17· cited 17×
- State v. BerryOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-03-02· cited 8×
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-05-01· cited 4×
- State v. BennettOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-12-07· cited 3×
- State v. PeningtonOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-11-21· cited 2×
- State v. ColvinOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-08-01· cited 1×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court· 1990-12-19· cited 1,637×
- State v. BallardOhio Supreme Court· 1981-06-24· cited 893×
- State v. StewartOhio Supreme Court· 1977-07-13· cited 788×
- State v. EngleOhio Supreme Court· 1996-02-14· cited 784×
- State v. SaxonOhio Supreme Court· 2006-03-20· cited 624×
- State v. GriggsOhio Supreme Court· 2004-09-08· cited 395×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court· 1988-12-28· cited 238×
- State v. CobbledickOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-10-01· cited 8×
- State v. WojtowiczOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-04-13· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.