State v. Smith
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 5833
Syllabus
CRIM.R. 33(B) — UNAVOIDABLE PREVENTION: The common pleas court did not abuse its discretion by denying defendant's Crim.R. 33(B) motion for leave to file a motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence where the evidence had not been suppressed by the State, but introduced at trial, and thus, defendant could not demonstrate that he was unavoidably prevented from discovering the grounds upon which he now relies to support his new-trial motion.
Judges: Bock
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Johnson v. Abdullah (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2021-09-22· cited 666×
- State v. HattonOhio Supreme Court· 2022-11-10· cited 113×
- State v. McKnightOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-08-03· cited 11×
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-12-27· cited 8×
- State v. CollinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-08-20· cited 6×
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-11-01· cited 6×
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-01-05· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.