Skip to main content

State v. Smith

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 12

Syllabus

POSTCONVICTION — R.C. 2953.23(A) — SUCCESSIVE PETITIONS: The common pleas court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction to entertain defendant's successive petition for postconviction relief under R.C. 2953.23(A), because defendant's claims failed to satisfy the statutory exceptions for successive petitions under R.C. 2953.23(A)(1), where the claims were based on the charging document and not facts that the defendant was unavoidably prevented from discovering.

Judges: Bock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.