Missouri Court of Appeals· 12/13/2007
State v. Smiley
Citations
- 240 S.W.3d 214
- 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1699
- 2007 WL 4335674
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding an “isolated comment” was not prejudicial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jeffrey W. Bates
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-01-30· cited 1,505×
- State v. BaxterSupreme Court of Missouri· 2006-11-07· cited 113×
- State v. RoperMissouri Court of Appeals· 2004-06-29· cited 87×
- State v. CampbellMissouri Court of Appeals· 2004-01-05· cited 66×
- State v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals· 2006-02-10· cited 37×
- State v. StanleyMissouri Court of Appeals· 2004-01-20· cited 30×
- State v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals· 1996-11-12· cited 25×
- State v. SilasMissouri Court of Appeals· 1994-08-09· cited 25×
- State v. BellMissouri Court of Appeals· 2001-12-31· cited 21×
- State v. StillMissouri Court of Appeals· 2007-03-16· cited 14×
- State v. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals· 2003-04-08· cited 11×
- State v. FickeMissouri Court of Appeals· 1995-02-14· cited 7×
- Smiley v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 2006-07-28· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.