Skip to main content

State v. Smart

Citations

  • 37 Conn. App. 360
  • 656 A.2d 677
  • 1995 Conn. App. LEXIS 167

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no double jeopardy violation where defendant was convicted of “sale” and “possession . . . with intent to sell” the same drug, under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 21a- 278
  • offenses of possession of narcotics with intent to sell and sale of narcotics each contain element that other does not

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lavery

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.