Skip to main content

State v. Skinner

Citations

  • 515 P.2d 880
  • 110 Ariz. 135
  • 1973 Ariz. LEXIS 456

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a “jury may consider prior inconsistent statements as impeachment and as substantive evidence”
  • holding “we find no specific misconduct on the part of the prosecutor in calling [the witness] to the stand since the court had given permission for him to do so”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cameron, Holohan, Hays, Struckmeyer, Krucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Skinner

69 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.