Skip to main content

State v. Sines

Citations

  • 359 Or. 41
  • 379 P.3d 502
  • 2016 WL 1459146
  • 2016 Ore. LEXIS 252

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a search and seizure conducted by pri- vate individuals without police authorization or involvement did not violate Article I, section 9
  • holding that a search and seizure conducted by private individuals without police authorization or involve- ment did not violate Article I, section 9
  • noting that conduct that expresses meaning “includes, but is not limited to, writ- ten or spoken words” (citations omitted) (emphasis added)
  • failing to discourage private conduct is not sufficient to bring a private search within the scope of Article I, section 9
  • private individuals acting as agents of the state engage in state action for purposes of Article I, section 9
  • “Article I, section 9, applies only to government-conducted or directed searches and seizures, not those of private citizens.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Balmer, Kistler, Walters, Linder, Landau, Baldwin, Sercombe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.