Oregon Supreme Court· 4/14/2016
State v. Sines
Citations
- 359 Or. 41
- 379 P.3d 502
- 2016 WL 1459146
- 2016 Ore. LEXIS 252
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a search and seizure conducted by pri- vate individuals without police authorization or involvement did not violate Article I, section 9
- holding that a search and seizure conducted by private individuals without police authorization or involve- ment did not violate Article I, section 9
- noting that conduct that expresses meaning “includes, but is not limited to, writ- ten or spoken words” (citations omitted) (emphasis added)
- failing to discourage private conduct is not sufficient to bring a private search within the scope of Article I, section 9
- private individuals acting as agents of the state engage in state action for purposes of Article I, section 9
- “Article I, section 9, applies only to government-conducted or directed searches and seizures, not those of private citizens.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Balmer, Kistler, Walters, Linder, Landau, Baldwin, Sercombe
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. LienOregon Supreme Court· 2019-05-09· cited 18×
- Barrett v. PetersOregon Supreme Court· 2016-10-20· cited 14×
- State v. BentonOregon Supreme Court· 2023-08-10· cited 12×
- Harkness v. PlattenOregon Supreme Court· 2016-06-16· cited 8×
- State v. KellerOregon Supreme Court· 2017-06-22· cited 6×
- State v. SinesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-09-20· cited 5×
- State v. BentonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-02-09· cited 5×
- State v. HallCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-03-22· cited 4×
- State v. De Witt SimonsOregon Supreme Court· 2026-03-26· cited 4×
- State v. KellerMultnomah County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-06-15· cited 2×
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court· 1989-03-21· cited 2,560×
- State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court· 1993-07-01· cited 660×
- State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court· 1986-11-20· cited 434×
- State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court· 1990-05-10· cited 205×
- State v. TannerOregon Supreme Court· 1987-11-17· cited 194×
- State v. NagelOregon Supreme Court· 1994-09-09· cited 119×
- Hampton Tree Farms, Inc. v. JewettOregon Supreme Court· 1995-03-30· cited 109×
- United States of America, -Appellee v. Larry SouzaTenth Circuit· 2000-08-24· cited 97×
- United States v. RichardsonFourth Circuit· 2010-06-11· cited 83×
- United States v. William Adderson JarrettFourth Circuit· 2003-07-29· cited 64×
- United States v. CameronFirst Circuit· 2012-11-14· cited 62×
- State v. TuckerOregon Supreme Court· 2000-03-09· cited 61×
- Vaughn v. First Transit, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-04-16· cited 54×
- United States v. SmytheTenth Circuit· 1996-05-17· cited 52×
- United States v. DayFourth Circuit· 2010-01-08· cited 46×
- People v. McMillonSupreme Court of Colorado· 1995-04-03· cited 28×
- State v. LowryCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-12-18· cited 22×
- State v. WallSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2006-10-13· cited 11×
- State v. WaterburyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-01-19· cited 9×
- State v. LumanOregon Supreme Court· 2009-12-31· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.