Court of Appeals of Oregon· 12/18/1978

State v. Lowry

Citations

588 P.2d 623
37 Or. App. 641
1978 Ore. App. LEXIS 2282

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“[P]ast episodes [of receiving benefits for informing on other inmates] did not constitute sufficient involvement in Reed’s self-initiated interrogation of defendant to bring into play the exclusionary protection.”
the exclusionary rule did not apply where a detective told the informant that he was not interested in information on the defendant and that the informant should not be asking questions of any inmate
“The only substantial issue in this case is whether there was sufficient official police involvement in [the infor- mant’s] obtaining of any of the statements from defendant to bring into play the exclusionary protection of the Fifth Amendment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schwab, C.J., and Lee, Richardson and Joseph

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.