State v. Simpson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that remand for resentencing is appropriate when sentence for reversed conviction appears to have influenced trial court's sentence for the affirmed conviction
• holding that remand for resentencing is appropriate when sentence for reversed conviction appears to have influenced trial court’s sentence for the affirmed conviction
• when fewer than all convictions are reversed on appeal, remand for resentencing not required if separate sentences were imposed for each offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Martin
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2007-09-07· cited 24×
• State v. Turgeon
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1996-03-08· cited 22×
• People v. Brady
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2007-01-11· cited 20×
• State v. Jason L. Gagne
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2016-06-10· cited 14×
• State v. Martin
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2009-01-30· cited 9×
• State of Vermont v. Jacob M. Rillo
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2020-09-11· cited 2×
• State v. Roy H. Kuhlmann
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2021-07-16· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Payne
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1983-10-21· cited 128×
• People v. Alcazar
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1988-04-18· cited 45×
• People v. Bammes
  California Court of Appeal· 1968-09-11· cited 40×
• State v. Sidway
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1981-04-14· cited 39×
• State v. Carpenter
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1983-05-18· cited 27×
• People v. Poe
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1984-02-01· cited 27×
• State v. Beayon
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1992-02-14· cited 18×
• People v. Kerger
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1989-12-01· cited 13×