State v. Beayon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a careless driving statute could not be used as a predicate for vehicular homicide because careless driving can occur without criminal negligence
• holding that a careless driving statute could not be used as a predicate for vehicular homicide because careless driving can occur without criminal negligence
• observing that we often have “implied guilty intent as an element when none was expressly provided by the statute”
• observing that we often have “implied guilty intent as an element when none was expressly provided by the statute”
• \We have often implied guilty intent as an element when none was expressly provided by the statute.\
• “We have often implied guilty intent as an element when none was expressly provided by the statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).