Supreme Court of Iowa· 5/18/1983
State v. Carpenter
Citations
- 334 N.W.2d 137
- 1983 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1542
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that \[t]he meaning of the terms 'accident' and 'involved' is sufficiently certain\ and not vague when applied to a scenario where a victim was injured jumping out of the defendant's moving truck
- statute imposing duty on persons “involved in” an accident “does not require that the driver’s conduct be a proximate cause of the accident”
- driver whose intoxicated girlfriend jumped from his moving pickup truck was involved in an accident
- “[Iowa’s hit-and-run] statute does not require a collision between the driver’s vehicle and another vehicle or person” in order to be deemed to have been “involved” in an “accident”
- \[Iowa's hit-and-run] statute does not require a collision between the driver's vehicle and another vehicle or person\ in order to be deemed to have been \involved\ in an \accident\
- statute does not require a collision between the driver's vehicle and another vehicle or person and does not require that the driver's conduct be a proximate cause of the accident; \involved\ means \to relate closely\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harris, McCormick, Schultz, Carter, Wolle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. SpargoSupreme Court of Iowa· 1985-03-20· cited 64×
- McCown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2006-03-02· cited 53×
- Wylie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1990-08-10· cited 52×
- Kil v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1991-07-01· cited 48×
- State v. SilvaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-06-04· cited 42×
- Sheldon v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2003-03-06· cited 39×
- Smith v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1989-04-18· cited 30×
- Commonwealth v. KauffmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-07-24· cited 27×
- Clancy v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2013-11-27· cited 24×
- Comstock v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1990-05-09· cited 19×
- State v. RodgersCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-10-16· cited 18×
- State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Vermont· 1993-04-30· cited 11×
- State v. CameronSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1999-06-16· cited 8×
- Armstrong v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2004-11-23· cited 8×
- State of New Jersey v. Jean A. SeneNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2015-11-25· cited 6×
- David Michael McCown v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2006-03-02
- David Michael McCown A/K/A David M. McCown v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2006-03-02
- Stephens Stratton Sheldon v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2003-01-30
- People v. BradyAppellate Court of Illinois· 2007-01-11
- State of West Virginia v. Micah A. McClainWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2022-11-17
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. SchrierSupreme Court of Iowa· 1981-01-14· cited 96×
- State v. WillisSupreme Court of Iowa· 1974-05-22· cited 45×
- State v. AldrichSupreme Court of Iowa· 1975-07-31· cited 40×
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa· 1981-07-15· cited 22×
- State v. RobinetteSupreme Court of Iowa· 1974-03-27· cited 20×
- Farm & City Insurance Co. v. PotterSupreme Court of Iowa· 1983-02-16· cited 17×
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of Iowa· 1982-01-20· cited 11×
- State v. SebbenSupreme Court of Iowa· 1971-04-09· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.