Supreme Court of Kansas· 7/8/2011

State v. Simmons

Citations

254 P.3d 97
292 Kan. 406
254 P.3d 94
2011 Kan. LEXIS 234

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the prosecutor improperly told the prospective jurors during jury selection to view the kidnapping and rape case “in light of the Stockholm Syndrome[,]” because 1
noting that two-part framework has been applied to the voir dire process
noting that two-part framework has been applied to the voir dire process
finding the prosecution’s multiple references to Stockholm Syndrome [not in evidence] and providing the jury with cases illustrating the syndrome was gross and flagrant conduct
discussing rules of ethics prohibiting attorneys from telling jury about evidence that is not or will not be in evidence and cases finding that doing so is error
discussing rules of ethics prohibiting attorneys from telling jury about evidence that is not or will not be in evidence and cases finding that doing so is error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nuss, Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.