South Dakota Supreme Court· 9/4/1996
State v. Sieler
Citations
- 1996 SD 114
- 554 N.W.2d 477
- 1996 S.D. LEXIS 124
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[Defendant’s] -6- #30308 sentence was not increased by the words ‘separate transaction,’ only his parole eligibility is affected by these words.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Amundson, Miller, Konenkamp, Gilbertson, Sabers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. PerovichSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2001-07-25· cited 45×
- Lykken v. ClassSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-03-19· cited 43×
- State v. PasekSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2004-12-22· cited 30×
- State v. ThayerSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2006-04-19· cited 17×
- State v. SpringerSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2014-11-12· cited 13×
- Dale v. YoungSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2015-12-16· cited 13×
- State v. GarzaSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2014-09-24· cited 12×
- State v. PuthoffSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-07-09· cited 10×
- State v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2005-02-16· cited 10×
- State v. RoedderSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2019-01-30· cited 10×
- State v. SemradSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2011-02-16· cited 9×
- State v. MeyersSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-10-08· cited 7×
- State v. VatneSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2003-03-19· cited 7×
- State v. KramerSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2008-07-23· cited 7×
- State v. WashingtonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2024-10-23· cited 7×
- State v. PentecostSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2015-08-12· cited 5×
- State v. LitschewskiSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2011-12-21· cited 4×
- State v. CookSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2015-06-17· cited 2×
- Litschewski v. DooleyD. South Dakota· 2014-12-23
- State v. SimonsenSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2024-04-10
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court· 1979-05-29· cited 3,299×
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 2,221×
- Ernest S. Borum v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1969-05-19· cited 76×
- United States v. Raymond MarquezSecond Circuit· 1974-11-04· cited 76×
- Willie Junior Rakes v. United StatesFourth Circuit· 1962-10-29· cited 57×
- United States v. Daniel Ignatz Tramp, Also Known as Dan DaileyEighth Circuit· 1994-08-01· cited 46×
- State v. FordSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1982-12-28· cited 45×
- State v. ObanSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1985-07-31· cited 43×
- State v. SwallowSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1987-04-22· cited 40×
- United States v. Doyle E. Raftis, Vernon F. Hawkins, Thomas M. Bugg, Curt Martin, Melville W. Ahlmeyer, Hildreth M. Kniss, Raymond P. GuzyEighth Circuit· 1970-06-16· cited 38×
- State v. CadySouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1988-04-20· cited 35×
- State v. TibbettsSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1983-05-04· cited 32×
- People v. SandovalCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1994-11-18· cited 32×
- Ex Parte WattSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1950-09-28· cited 30×
- State v. JacksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1978-11-30· cited 28×
- State v. BucholzSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1987-04-01· cited 25×
- State v. KarpSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1995-02-15· cited 15×
- Willard Junior Chunn v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1972-06-19· cited 11×
- Application of GroshSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1987-11-25· cited 9×
- State v. ThomasSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1993-04-28· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.