United States v. Doyle E. Raftis, Vernon F. Hawkins, Thomas M. Bugg, Curt Martin, Melville W. Ahlmeyer, Hildreth M. Kniss, Raymond P. Guzy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that no material discrepancy existed where the “clear import of the judge’s language” showed \intent to suspend the sentence ... and that impreciseness of language will not negate the court’s obvious intent.\
• “[T]he intent to suspend the sentence flows from the language used in the verbal pronouncement of the sentence and ... impreciseness of language will not negate the court’s obvious intent.”
• “the intent to suspend the sentence flows from the language used in the verbal pronouncement of the sentence and ... impreciseness of language will not negate the court’s obvious intent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).