State v. Kramer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A defendant’s motion to correct an illegal sentence does not permit a challenge to the underlying conviction.”
• “A defendant’s motion to correct an illegal sentence does not permit a challenge to the underlying conviction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Garza
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2014-09-24· cited 12×
• State v. Pentecost
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2015-08-12· cited 5×
• State v. Krause
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2017-04-12· cited 2×
• State v. Humpal
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2017-12-06

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Tibbetts
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1983-05-04· cited 32×
• State v. Sieler
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1996-09-04· cited 30×
• State v. Flittie
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1982-04-21· cited 29×
• State v. Burdick
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2006-03-08· cited 19×
• State v. Kerrigan
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2006-05-26· cited 14×
• State v. Oscarson
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2006-04-14· cited 14×
• Application of Grosh
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1987-11-25· cited 9×
• State v. Arguello
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1996-05-22· cited 7×
• State v. Moon
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1994-04-06· cited 7×
• State v. Steen
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 2003-07-16· cited 6×
• State v. Thomas
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1993-04-28· cited 6×
• State v. Schwebach
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-04-12· cited 4×