State v. Cox

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding sentencing issue unpreserved when an objection was not made at the time the sentence was imposed
• holding the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole, and Pardon Services's issue was not preserved when it filed a motion for reconsideration, but did not contemporaneously object to the defendant's sentences
• \[A]n aggrieved party is one who is injured in a legal sense or has suffered an injury to person or property.\
• \[A]n aggrieved party is one who is injured in a legal sense or has suffered an injury to person or property.\
• \[A]n illegal sentence cannot be challenged on direct appeal absent a contemporaneous objection. This concept applies to the State as well as to criminal defendants.\ (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Rearick
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2016-08-17· cited 7×
• State v. Looper
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2017-11-08· cited 4×
• State v. Hardin
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2020-01-29
• State v. Quinn
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2020-05-06
• State v. Zantravious Randell Hall
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2022-06-01

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Torrence
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-05-20· cited 352×
• State v. Shumate
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-02-17· cited 25×
• Ex Parte Whetstone
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-05-22· cited 23×
• Cisson v. McWhorter
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1970-11-24· cited 22×
• State v. Johnston
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-06-16· cited 6×