State v. Shrum

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a state decision did not satisfy Rule 32.1(g) because it did not “overrule any prior opinion”
• holding that a state decision did not satisfy Rule 32.1(g) because it did not “overrule any prior opinion”
• noting “few exceptions” to “general rule of preclusion” for claims in untimely or successive petitions
• noting “few exceptions” to “general rule of preclusion” for claims in untimely or successive petitions
• noting \few exceptions\ to \general rule of preclusion\ for claims in untimely or successive petitions
• noting \few exceptions\ to \general rule of preclusion\ for claims in untimely or successive petitions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).