Court of Appeals of Arizona· 9/30/2011
State v. Harden
Citations
- 263 P.3d 680
- 228 Ariz. 131
- 618 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 6
- 2011 Ariz. App. LEXIS 168
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing the trial court may dismiss untimely “facially non-meritorious notices” without appointing counsel
- affirming summary dismissal of deficient successive notice claiming an ambiguity in the terms of probation
- trial court may dismiss untimely “facially non-meritorious notices” without appointing counsel
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Espinosa, Vásquez, Kelly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State of Arizona v. Martin David Salazar-MercadoCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2013-06-20· cited 6×
- Star Publishing Co. v. BerniniCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-01-27· cited 2×
- State v. StuebeCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2020-06-30· cited 2×
- Star Publishing Co. v. State of Arizona, Timothy Lynn KreusCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-01-27
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. HansenArizona Supreme Court· 2007-05-30· cited 146×
- State v. ShrumArizona Supreme Court· 2009-03-19· cited 75×
- Haroutunian v. Valueoptions, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-07-10· cited 54×
- State v. PettyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-08-31· cited 47×
- Potter v. VanderpoolCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-10-05· cited 40×
- Osterkamp v. BrowningCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2011-02-25· cited 15×
- State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2011-03-31· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.