State v. Peek

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that claims of an illegal sentence are covered by Rule 32.1(c), not Rule 32.1(d), (e), (f), (g), or (h)
• rejecting argument based on case law requiring interpretation contrary to statute’s plain language
• “lifetime probation was clearly available for an attempted child molestation occurring . . . after the effective date of [Arizona Revised Statutes section 13-902(E)’s] 1997 amendment.”
• ‘When the legislature intends to include attempts, it knows how to do so.”
• statutory language is the best indication of the legislature’s intent
• claim of illegal sentence must be timely presented

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).