Skip to main content

State v. Short

Citations

  • 2020 Ohio 5034

Syllabus

The trial court had jurisdiction to consider appellant's motion for a new mitigation trial. Ohio's death penalty scheme does not violate the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial because the jury – not the trial judge – is required to find the defendant guilty of the aggravating circumstance specification necessary for death penalty eligibility. Thus, appellant is not entitled to a new mitigation trial under the authority of Hurst v. Florida, 577 U.S. 92, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016). Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Tucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.