Ohio Court of Appeals· 1/10/2020
State v. Chinn
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 43
Syllabus
The jury, not the trial court, made the factual determination resulting in appellant's death penalty eligibility. Thus, Hurst v. Florida, ___ U.S. ___, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016) is not applicable. Further, Hurst v. Florida does not apply retroactively to cases on collateral review. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Tucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 2002-06-24· cited 4,683×
- Hurst v. FloridaSupreme Court· 2016-01-12· cited 1,067×
- State v. Belton (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-04-20· cited 156×
- State v. PenixOhio Supreme Court· 1987-09-16· cited 141×
- State v. ChinnOhio Supreme Court· 1999-06-02· cited 115×
- In re: Douglas ColeySixth Circuit· 2017-09-11· cited 69×
- State v. Mason (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-04-18· cited 63×
- State v. NicholsOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-09-16· cited 34×
- State v. CasselOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-06-17· cited 23×
- State v. WarrenOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-03-10· cited 11×
- State v. LandrumOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-03-29· cited 8×
- State v. LorraineOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-08-20· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.