Texas Supreme Court· 5/27/1964
State v. Shoppers World, Inc.
Citations
- 380 S.W.2d 107
- 7 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 436
- 1964 Tex. LEXIS 660
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- if statute omits necessary element, court to construe statute to give effect to legislative intent
- if statute omits necessary element, court to construe statute to give effect to legislative intent
- statute must not be given the one of two reasonable interpretations which will render it unconstitutional
- “[C]ourts of equity will take jurisdiction to enjoin enforcement of penal laws only in exceptional situations, thus leaving those laws to be interpreted through the criminal trial process whenever possible.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Calvert
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
68 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ex Parte GranvielCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-02-01· cited 401×
- Ely v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-07-03· cited 329×
- Pennington v. SingletonTexas Supreme Court· 1980-09-12· cited 279×
- Texas Liquor Control Board v. Canyon Creek Land Corp.Texas Supreme Court· 1970-07-08· cited 182×
- State Ex Rel. Grimes County Taxpayers Ass'n v. Texas Municipal Power AgencyCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1978-03-02· cited 103×
- Minton v. FrankTexas Supreme Court· 1976-10-13· cited 98×
- James v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-04-26· cited 80×
- Passel v. Fort Worth Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court· 1969-04-16· cited 79×
- Crum & Forster, Inc. v. Monsanto Co.Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 1994-10-18· cited 65×
- In Re JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1977-06-30· cited 60×
- State v. Spartan's Industries, Inc.Texas Supreme Court· 1969-11-05· cited 56×
- Ex Parte SchroeterCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-11-26· cited 45×
- Marcus Joseph Roper v. Katherine Elizabeth JolliffeTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2015-10-09· cited 45×
- Risk Managers International, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1993-08-25· cited 42×
- Ex Parte HaywardCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-04-23· cited 40×
- State Ex Rel. Vance v. HattenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-05-28· cited 40×
- State v. KaiserCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1992-03-18· cited 37×
- Leach v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1968-05-15· cited 28×
- Wojcik v. WesolickTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2003-01-16· cited 28×
- Harris County Appraisal District v. United Investors Realty TrustTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2001-06-14· cited 26×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court· 1911-05-29· cited 112×
- McKinney v. BlankenshipTexas Supreme Court· 1955-10-12· cited 94×
- Crouch v. CraikTexas Supreme Court· 1963-06-12· cited 58×
- Gann v. KeithTexas Supreme Court· 1952-12-03· cited 22×
- Sweeny Hospital District v. CarrTexas Supreme Court· 1964-04-22· cited 21×
- Armendiaz v. StillmanTexas Supreme Court· 1881-03-31· cited 17×
- Shoppers World, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1963-10-30· cited 13×
- Harvey v. PriestSupreme Court of Missouri· 1963-03-11· cited 12×
- Ex Parte WilsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1964-01-15· cited 10×
- In Re TschoepeS.D. Texas· 1936-02-01· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.