Minton v. Frank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We think the clear intent of the Act, taken in its entirety, is to exempt qualified attorneys from the [security] provisions of section 6.“
• “It necessarily follows that otherwise qualified attorneys are exempt from [the sheriffs] ‘SeeActofMay 13,1999,76thLeg., R.S., ch. 388, $0 I( enacting chapter 1704), 6 (repealing article 2372~3
• \It necessarily follows that otherwise qualified attorneys are exempt from [the sheriff's] bonding requirements.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).