State v. Shockey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, if a 100 percent schedular rating is granted, a veteran is not also entitled to TDIU for the same period
• “ ‘[T]he Secretary may not seek review of any ... decision’ of the [Board] ....
• “[s]ince the veteran in this case is entitled to a 100% schedular rating for his service-connected lymphadeno-pathy, he is not eligible for a TDIU evaluation”
• \'[T]he Secretary may not seek review of any . . . decision' of the [Board] . . . .\ (quoting 38 U.S.C. § 7252(a)
• “The [Board is] required to reevaluate the veteran’s claim using the amended rating schedule.”
• “The [Board is] required to reevaluate the veteran’s claim using the amended rating schedule.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).