Supreme Court of Iowa· 1/22/1975
State v. Hines
Citations
- 225 N.W.2d 156
- 1975 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 913
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that review of “good cause” determination to avoid dismissal for speedy trial purposes is abuse of discretion
- holding non-chronic court congestion arising out of unique, non-recurring events may constitute “good cause” for delay
- rejecting the premise that chronic court congestion can serve as “good cause” for continuances
- good cause not established where a judge continued the case five days before the end of the 60-day period for trial because of discharge of a depleted jury panel
- good cause not established where a judge continued the case five days before the end of the 60-day period for trial because of discharge of a depleted jury panel
- failure to staff courtroom with sufficient jurors not good cause for continuance
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reynoldson, Mason, Rawlings, Legrand, Harris, McCormick, Moore, Rees, Uhlen-Hopp
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-02-07· cited 159×
- Iowa Civil Liberties Union v. CritelliSupreme Court of Iowa· 1976-07-30· cited 83×
- State v. JacobySupreme Court of Iowa· 1977-12-21· cited 76×
- State v. DonnellSupreme Court of Iowa· 1976-03-17· cited 61×
- State v. EgeSupreme Court of Iowa· 1979-01-24· cited 47×
- State v. BondSupreme Court of Iowa· 1983-11-23· cited 45×
- State v. AlbertsenSupreme Court of Iowa· 1975-04-16· cited 28×
- State v. WrightSupreme Court of Iowa· 1975-10-15· cited 25×
- State v. GoffSupreme Court of Iowa· 1976-07-30· cited 24×
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Iowa· 1977-02-16· cited 23×
- State v. LeonardSupreme Court of Iowa· 1976-04-14· cited 23×
- State v. SassmanSupreme Court of Iowa· 1975-03-19· cited 21×
- State v. BrandtSupreme Court of Iowa· 1977-04-20· cited 20×
- State v. KyleSupreme Court of Iowa· 1978-11-22· cited 19×
- State v. GradySupreme Court of Iowa· 1975-07-31· cited 14×
- State v. HardinCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 1997-06-26· cited 12×
- State v. LybargerSupreme Court of Iowa· 1978-03-22· cited 12×
- State v. HathawaySupreme Court of Iowa· 1977-09-21· cited 11×
- State v. NewmanSupreme Court of Iowa· 1977-08-31· cited 11×
- State v. BallSupreme Court of Iowa· 1999-09-09· cited 10×
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
- Dickey v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1970-05-25· cited 824×
- State v. AlvarezNebraska Supreme Court· 1972-11-24· cited 186×
- State v. JenningsSupreme Court of Iowa· 1972-02-25· cited 80×
- State v. GorhamSupreme Court of Iowa· 1973-04-25· cited 61×
- State v. MaysSupreme Court of Iowa· 1973-02-21· cited 44×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa· 1974-04-24· cited 40×
- State v. MyersSupreme Court of Iowa· 1956-11-13· cited 32×
- State v. MeeksSupreme Court of Iowa· 1954-06-15· cited 30×
- State v. PetersonSupreme Court of Iowa· 1971-09-09· cited 30×
- State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Iowa· 1974-10-16· cited 29×
- State v. MorningstarSupreme Court of Iowa· 1973-05-23· cited 24×
- State v. BowersSupreme Court of Iowa· 1968-11-12· cited 20×
- Evans v. RosenbergerSupreme Court of Iowa· 1970-11-10· cited 18×
- State v. ShockeySupreme Court of Iowa· 1974-01-16· cited 17×
- State v. JestesWashington Supreme Court· 1968-12-13· cited 15×
- State v. BledsoeSupreme Court of Iowa· 1972-09-19· cited 15×
- State v. JesseWashington Supreme Court· 1965-01-14· cited 14×
- State v. McEversWashington Supreme Court· 1969-05-15· cited 11×
- State v. GarmanWashington Supreme Court· 1969-09-04· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.