State v. Zaehringer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the -24- elements of the delivery of marijuana offense do not involve “deceit, fraud, cheating, or stealing”
• holding that delivery of marijuana does not involve dishonesty or false statement
• holding delivery-of-marijuana offense inadmissible under common-law impeachment rule because that crime does not involve dishonesty or false statement
• holding delivery-of-marijuana offense inadmissible under common-law impeachment rule because that crime does not involve 18 dishonesty or false statement
• unsubstantiated arguments and statement of counsel insufficient to prove witness unavailable
• distribution offenses do not involve “deceit, fraud, cheating, or stealing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).