State v. Shirley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• exclusionary rule applies when officers conducting illegal search and seizure knew of probationer’s status
• where police searches are consciously directed toward probationers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Alfaro
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1980-12-15· cited 30×
• Commonwealth v. Olsen
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1989-08-07· cited 23×
• State v. Burkholder
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1984-07-25· cited 23×
• Hughes v. Gwinn
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1981-03-17· cited 12×
• Scott v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-11-30· cited 9×
• State v. Towle
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-04-04· cited 4×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Morrissey v. Brewer
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 10,835×
• Elkins v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1960-06-27· cited 2,501×
• Mempa v. Rhay
  Supreme Court· 1967-11-13· cited 1,589×
• In Re Martinez
  California Supreme Court· 1970-01-23· cited 191×
• Jose Verdugo and Horace Eugene Turner v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 1968-10-07· cited 175×
• United States v. William Gordon Winsett
  Ninth Circuit· 1975-05-27· cited 110×
• United States v. Gordon
  Supreme Court· 1970-02-24· cited 100×
• United States v. Gerald Duane Vandemark
  Ninth Circuit· 1975-07-10· cited 78×
• State v. Montgomery
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1977-06-17· cited 72×
• Air Line Pilots Ass'n v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1970-02-24· cited 42×
• State v. Price
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1976-12-09· cited 10×
• State v. Jeffers
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1977-05-16· cited 9×