State v. Shearer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he trial judge is given a ‘fair range of discretion’ in deciding whether a prior statement is inconsistent with testimony given at trial.” (Quoting Rigelman v. Gilligan, 265 Or 109, 121, 506 P2d 710 (1973).)
• “[T]he trial judge is given a ‘fair range of discretion’ in deciding whether a prior statement is inconsistent with testimony given at trial.” (Quoting Rigelman v. Gilligan, 265 Or 109, 121, 506 P2d 710 (1973).)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State v. Ramirez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-03-17· cited 12×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Middleton
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1983-01-18· cited 320×
• State v. Milbradt
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1988-05-17· cited 149×
• State v. Isom
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1988-09-21· cited 118×
• State v. Burdge
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1983-05-10· cited 33×
• State v. Johnson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1977-01-27· cited 22×
• Rigelman v. Gilligan
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1973-02-23· cited 19×
• State v. Pigg
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-10-07· cited 6×
• State v. Taylor
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-10-26· cited 1×