Court of Appeals of Oregon· 3/17/2021

State v. Ramirez

Citations

310 Or. App. 62
483 P.3d 1232

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that error in excluding impeachment evidence was harmful where victim’s credibility was a “core issue” in the case
“Confronting a witness with the witness’s own prior inconsistent statements is not hearsay, but rather a type of impeachment evidence not offered for the truth of matter asserted but to cast doubt on the credibility of the witness.”
“[W]e do not usurp the role of the fact- finder and determine if defendant is guilty or reweigh the evidence.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)
“[W]e do not usurp the role of the fact- finder and determine if defendant is guilty or reweigh the evidence.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)
“Evidentiary error is not presumed to be harmful, and we will affirm a defendant’s conviction if there is little likelihood that the particular error affected the verdict.”
“Evidentiary error is not presumed to be harmful, and we will affirm a defendant’s conviction if there is little likelihood that the particular error affected the verdict.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: James

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.