Skip to main content
· 3/4/2022

State v. Mughni

Citations

  • 185 N.E.3d 678
  • 2022 Ohio 626

Syllabus

SPEEDY TRIAL: The trial court did not err in dismissing the charges against defendant for violation of his right to a speedy trial where the length of delay between the filing of the arrest warrant and the formal indictment was eight-and-a-half months, the state made no effort to execute the arrest warrant during the delay, defendant timely invoked his right to a speedy trial, and the trial court made the factual finding that defendant suffered prejudice because of the delay.

Judges: Bergeron

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.