Ohio Court of Appeals· 3/14/2022

State v. Scott

Citations

2022 Ohio 745

Syllabus

Trial court's judgment finding defendant guilty was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The appeal of the imposition of maximum consecutive sentences was moot when the sentences were already completed and no judicial remedy was available. The trial court did not err in imposing fines as part of the sentence.

Judges: Willamowski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

State v. Doseck
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-01-22· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Thompkins
Ohio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
State v. Hacker
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-10-26· cited 120×
State v. Moorer
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-02-25· cited 20×
State v. Hall
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-06-15· cited 4×
State v. Oglesby
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-04-19· cited 4×
State v. Murphy
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-04-26· cited 3×
State v. McAbee
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-12-19· cited 2×
State v. Jones
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-03-28· cited 2×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.