State v. Jones

Citations

• 2019 Ohio 1126

Syllabus

Consecutive sentences R.C. 2929.14(C)(4). The defendant's assignment of error is moot to the extent that it challenges the consecutive nature of his sentence because he completed his sentence during the pendency of the appeal. The trial court inadvertently failed to incorporate its statutory findings supporting consecutive sentences in its journal entry. Case is remanded for trial court to issue a nunc pro tunc sentencing entry incorporating the statutory findings and correcting the clerical errors concerning the defendant's felony conviction.