New Mexico Court of Appeals· 3/14/2008
State v. Scott
Citations
- 185 P.3d 1081
- 144 N.M. 231
- 2008 NMCA 075
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[I]f the evidence is insufficient to legally sustain one of the elements of a crime, the error is fundamental and may be raised for the first time on appeal.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pickard, Wechsler, Vigil
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- McCoy v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2019-06-03· cited 1,974×
- State v. BrandtSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-07-25· cited 97×
- State v. VanceNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2008-12-09· cited 10×
- State of Iowa v. Randy Allen CrawfordSupreme Court of Iowa· 2022-03-18
- State v. ValdezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2024-07-03
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. McCraryNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1984-01-05· cited 66×
- Cobb v. State Canvassing BoardNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2006-05-16· cited 59×
- State v. WassonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-04-16· cited 56×
- In Re Gabriel M.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2002-03-07· cited 36×
- State v. NguyenNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-04-09· cited 17×
- State v. CarbajalNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2002-05-29· cited 13×
- State v. CowleyNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1968-03-01· cited 12×
- State v. CearleyNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2004-07-14· cited 8×
- State v. SandovalNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2007-06-19· cited 4×
- State v. TorresNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2000-03-10· cited 3×
- State v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2008-02-05· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.