Supreme Court of Kansas· 1/26/1996

State v. Bryan

Citations

259 Kan. 143
910 P.2d 212
1996 Kan. LEXIS 3

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

pointing out that, since Coates v. Cincinnati, “[o]ther courts have followed the holding in Coates in determining that statutes prohibiting annoying conduct are impermissibly vague”
stalking statute struck down as unconstitutionally vague because terms lacked definition and there was no objective standard
stalking statute struck down as unconstitutionally vague because terms lacked definition and there was no objective standard
pointing out that, since Coates v. Cincinnati , \[o]ther courts have followed the holding in Coates in determining that statues prohibiting annoying conduct are impermissibly vague\
considering Kansas stalking statute and noting that it lacked an objective standard
considering Kansas stalking statute and noting that it lacked an objective standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.