Skip to main content

State v. Scott

Citations

  • 311 Or. App. 175
  • 488 P.3d 803

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that, “even if defendant had objected, the trial court likely would have concluded under then-existing law that the funds belonged to him”
  • noting trial court’s belief to that effect before being reminded of the funds posted as security
  • “[W]e find the erroneous imposition of attorney fees to be sufficiently grave. In this case, defendant’s sole source of income was social security disability, and the record does not establish any history of employment to conclude that he would be able to work.”
  • noting request for plain error review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Powers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.