Skip to main content

State v. Schroeder

Citations

  • 2004 SD 21
  • 674 N.W.2d 827
  • 2004 S.D. LEXIS 23

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • analyzing 2001 amendment and referring to it, inter alia, as a “change,” as resulting in an “amended” definition, 2 More particularly, the parties agreed that the relevant South Dakota drug schedules included (and therefore SDCL § 22-42-2 criminalized distribution of
  • positive urinalysis sufficient to support possession conviction because statutory definition of controlled substance includes metabolites of substances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Zinter, Gilbertson, Sabers, Konenkamp, Meierhenry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.