State v. Schroeder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• analyzing 2001 amendment and referring to it, inter alia, as a “change,” as resulting in an “amended” definition, 2 More particularly, the parties agreed that the relevant South Dakota drug schedules included (and therefore SDCL § 22-42-2 criminalized distribution of
• positive urinalysis sufficient to support possession conviction because statutory definition of controlled substance includes metabolites of substances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).