Skip to main content

State v. Muniz

Citations

  • 332 Or. App. 56
  • 548 P.3d 172

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering the “emotionally fraught” nature of the case in evaluating whether curative instruction would have been sufficient to remedy prejudice
  • considering the “emotionally fraught” nature of the case in evaluating whether curative instruction would have been sufficient to remedy prejudice
  • the prosecutor’s improper appeal to the jurors’ emotions during rebuttal closing argument in an “emotion- ally fraught case” was incurable
  • “[I]t was improper for the prosecutor to interject his 794 State v. Kurz personal opinion regarding defendant’s conduct * * *.”
  • “[I]t was improper for the prosecutor to interject his personal opinion regarding defendant’s conduct * * *.”
  • acknowl- edging that there are some cases where statements are so prejudicial that, “as a practical matter, the bell once rung, cannot be unrung” by a curative instruction (internal quota- tion marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.