State v. Noble

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[a]n attempt requires that the actor have specific intent to perform acts and attain a result which if accomplished would constitute the crime alleged”
• stating that “[a]n attempt requires that the actor have specific intent to perform acts and attain a result which if accomplished would constitute the crime 4 alleged”
• “An attempt requires that the actor have the specific intent to perform acts and attain a result which if accomplished would constitute the crime alleged.”
• “An attempt requires that the actor have specific intent to perform acts and attain a result that if accomplished would constitute the crime alleged.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State v. Bakdash
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2013-05-20· cited 8×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Roe v. Wade
  Supreme Court· 1973-01-22· cited 5,581×
• State v. Kuhnau
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2001-03-01· cited 128×
• State v. Daniels
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-02-08· cited 119×
• State v. Flores
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1988-01-15· cited 92×
• State v. Cooper
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-03-27· cited 90×
• State v. Blasus
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-09-15· cited 49×
• State v. Gisege
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-03-20· cited 36×
• State v. Sutherlin
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1986-11-21· cited 31×
• State v. Zupetz
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-08-13· cited 30×
• State v. Weaver
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-05-06· cited 11×
• State v. Schmitz
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1997-01-28· cited 10×
• State v. Chao Yang
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1995-06-20· cited 2×