Supreme Court of Florida· 4/3/1980
State v. Elder
Citations
- 382 So. 2d 687
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding a Florida statute prohibiting anonymous phone calls made with the intent to harass
- statute prohibiting a person from making a telephone call “whether or not conversation ensues, without disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any person at the called number”
- (“The Court will not . . . abandon judicial restraint and - 13 - disagree that the plurality’s solution—“[t]rial courts. . . instruct[ing] juries” consistent with our holding in Hurst v. State (Hurst), 202 So. 3d 40 (Fla. 2016
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sundberg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Scott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-10-06· cited 137×
- McLean v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-07-06· cited 125×
- Sunset Harbour Condo. Ass'n v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Florida· 2005-11-03· cited 125×
- State v. StalderSupreme Court of Florida· 1994-01-27· cited 71×
- St. Mary's Hospital, Inc. v. PhillipeSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-06-29· cited 62×
- Caple v. Tuttle's Design-Build, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-02-03· cited 54×
- McKnight v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-02-17· cited 54×
- Pallas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-05-03· cited 53×
- Perkins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1991-03-05· cited 52×
- State v. GattisNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1986-11-26· cited 43×
- Richardson v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-08-17· cited 43×
- Mary Gormley v. Director, Connecticut State Department of Adult ProbationSupreme Court· 1980-12-01· cited 38×
- City of Everett v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1984-06-18· cited 38×
- Metropolitan Dade County v. BridgesSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-07-30· cited 34×
- State v. FuchsSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-09-14· cited 33×
- Doe v. MorthamSupreme Court of Florida· 1998-03-19· cited 29×
- State v. ThorneWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1985-08-07· cited 29×
- Donley v. City of Mountain BrookCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1982-05-18· cited 21×
- Griffin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-03-12· cited 19×
- McKillop v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1993-08-06· cited 18×
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court· 1974-06-25· cited 4,525×
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1973-06-25· cited 4,338×
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court· 1972-06-26· cited 4,166×
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1940-05-20· cited 3,669×
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 3,080×
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1973-10-09· cited 3,038×
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1942-03-09· cited 2,706×
- Parker v. LevySupreme Court· 1974-06-19· cited 1,846×
- Cohen v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1971-06-07· cited 1,777×
- Stanley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1969-04-07· cited 1,725×
- Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1965-01-18· cited 1,449×
- Gooding v. WilsonSupreme Court· 1972-03-23· cited 1,392×
- Erznoznik v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court· 1975-06-23· cited 1,124×
- Kovacs v. CooperSupreme Court· 1949-02-28· cited 1,120×
- Watts v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-04-21· cited 977×
- Federal Communications Commission v. Pacifica FoundationSupreme Court· 1978-10-02· cited 761×
- Lehman v. City of Shaker HeightsSupreme Court· 1974-06-25· cited 685×
- Breard v. AlexandriaSupreme Court· 1951-06-04· cited 608×
- Lewis v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court· 1974-02-20· cited 533×
- Rowan v. United States Post Office DepartmentSupreme Court· 1970-06-15· cited 519×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.