Skip to main content

State v. Elder

Citations

  • 382 So. 2d 687

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding a Florida statute prohibiting anonymous phone calls made with the intent to harass
  • statute prohibiting a person from making a telephone call “whether or not conversation ensues, without disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any person at the called number”
  • (“The Court will not . . . abandon judicial restraint and - 13 - disagree that the plurality’s solution—“[t]rial courts. . . instruct[ing] juries” consistent with our holding in Hurst v. State (Hurst), 202 So. 3d 40 (Fla. 2016

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sundberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.