Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2/16/2005
State v. Sauls
Citations
- 197 Or. App. 545
- 106 P.3d 659
- 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 177
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that term “sexual relationship” is ambiguous in some contexts, but not where' sexual relationship was of two years’ duration
- noting that term “sexual relationship” is ambiguous in some contexts, but not where sexual relationship was of two years’ duration
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edmonds, Schuman, Wollheim
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.