State v. Hutchison

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “the definite article ‘the’ functions as an adjective to denote a particular, specified thing, not a general, unspecified class of things”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Quinto
  New York Court of Appeals· 2012-02-09· cited 24×
• State v. Harberts
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-03-30· cited 10×
• Belknap v. U. S. Bank National Ass'n
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-06-16· cited 9×
• Arlington Education Ass'n v. Arlington School District No. 3
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-12-15· cited 7×
• State v. Whittington
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2008-03-26· cited 6×
• State v. Sauls
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-02-16· cited 5×
• Hall v. Lampert
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-11-24· cited 4×
• State v. Eladem
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-02-14· cited 3×
• State v. McCrorey
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-11-12· cited 1×
• Belknap v. US BANK NAT. ASS'N
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-06-16
• State v. Labarre
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-11-13

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Cervantes
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1994-05-26· cited 131×
• Gladhart v. Oregon Vineyard Supply Co.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2001-06-08· cited 44×
• Anderson v. Jensen Racing, Inc.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1997-02-13· cited 32×