State v. Walker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• when a party “plainly put in issue the proper construction of the statute,” appellate court had an “obligation” to correctly construe the statute, “regardless of the parties’ arguments”
• where numerous statutes demonstrated that the legislature knew how to refer to a particular administrative agency, the fact that it did not do so in the statute at issue made it unlikely that it intended the latter statute to encompass that agency
• where numerous statutes demonstrated that the legislature knew how to refer to a particular administrative agency, the fact that it did not do so in the statute at issue made it unlikely that it intended the latter statute to encompass that agency

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State Ex Rel. Engweiler v. Felton
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2011-09-01· cited 24×
• Godfrey v. Fred Meyer Stores
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-11-23· cited 21×
• Bridgeview Vineyards, Inc. v. State Land Board
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-03-14· cited 10×
• Nakashima v. Board of Education
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-03-15· cited 8×
• State Ex Rel. Engweiler v. Powers
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-11-25· cited 8×
• State v. Castilleja
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-09-26· cited 5×
• State v. Sauls
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-02-16· cited 5×
• State v. George
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-06-18· cited 4×
• Salinas v. One Stop Detail
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-08-04· cited 2×
• Washington County v. Querbach
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-12-30· cited 2×
• Fast v. Moore
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-05-10