Skip to main content

State v. Sargent

Citations

  • 656 A.2d 1196
  • 1995 Me. LEXIS 60

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • no obvious error when there is ample evidence independent of challenged testimony and defendant not only failed to object, he cross-examined victim at great length regarding consent and made consent an issue
  • no abuse of discretion when the State provided lineup report after mistrial but twenty months before second trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wathen, C.J., and Roberts, Clifford, Rudman, Dana and Lipez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.