Bowden v. Grindle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plaintiff is mentally ill under Maine’s tolling statute if he experiences “an overall inability to function in society that prevents [him] from protecting [his] legal rights” (emphasis omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Davis v. Cox
  First Circuit· 2004-01-15· cited 48×
• State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Koshy
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2010-05-25· cited 48×
• Douglas v. York County
  First Circuit· 2005-12-28· cited 35×
• Guardianship of Hughes
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1998-07-24· cited 19×
• In Re Estate of Marquis
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2003-05-12· cited 8×
• Bonina v. Sheppard
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2017-06-01

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• McAfee v. Cole
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1994-02-18· cited 166×
• A.F.A.B., Inc. v. Town of Old Orchard Beach
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1994-03-28· cited 55×
• Bowden v. Grindle
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1994-12-20· cited 43×
• Federal Deposit Insurance v. Proia
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1995-09-13· cited 24×
• Williams v. Ubaldo
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1996-01-23· cited 18×
• McCain Foods, Inc. v. Gervais
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1995-05-04· cited 11×
• State v. Sargent
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1995-03-31· cited 8×
• Morris v. Hunter
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1994-12-29· cited 6×
• Bragdon v. Drew
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1995-05-25· cited 4×
• Era-Northern Associates v. Border Trust Co.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1995-08-09· cited 3×