Skip to main content

State v. Santos

Citations

  • 42 A.3d 141
  • 210 N.J. 129
  • 2012 WL 1581999
  • 2012 N.J. LEXIS 514

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • opining that appellate courts should exercise original jurisdiction \only 'with great frugality'\ (quoting In re Boardwalk Regency Casino License Application, 180 N.J. Super. 324, 334 (App. Div. 1981))
  • explaining that original jurisdiction by an appellate court is disfavored where fact-finding is involved
  • describing Rule 2:10-5 as “allowing [an] appellate court to exercise original jurisdiction to eliminate unnecessary further litigation, but discouraging its use if factfinding is involved”
  • reversing the grant of an evidentiary hearing on a claim under Nunez-Valdez because the plea 7 A-3479-15T3 form advised the defendant he \may be deported\
  • \A public entity is not liable . . . where the public employee is not liable.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lavecchia, Albin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.