Skip to main content

State v. Davis

Citations

  • 186 S.W.3d 367
  • 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1909
  • 2005 WL 3526511

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an in camera review of psychological counseling records should be conducted where the defendant cited to inconsistent statements the witness had provided to other people and witness's diary entries
  • concluding the exclusion of a child’s diary was prejudicial when the defendant was not permitted to cross-examine the child about prior false allegations of rape
  • “Evidence of prior allegations by an alleged victim of sexual abuse if that evidence is offered to impeach the credibility of the 10 victim as a witness does not violate the rape shield law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Newton, Hardwick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.